There has been a lot said about the annexation of property inside Limestone County by the cities of Decatur, Huntsville, and Madison. Much of what has been said is critical, but some of it has been positive. All the landowners that I have heard comment upon the situation feel they should be allowed to petition any city, even those outside Limestone County, to annex their property. I think most of them are looking to increase the value of their property if they want to sell, or they feel one city may be more able to provide services to them if they wish to live on the property.
The fact is that annexation by these outside cities is legal, and efforts we have made to halt it have not been successful. Annexation by these outside cities creates problems for local governments and Limestone County residents, and we will have to deal with them now and in the future.
One example of this is now upon us, and it is a tax increase. The City of Madison had special legislation passed last year, which resulted in a constitutional amendment being placed on the 2008 November ballot. This referendum will put the issue to the citizens of Alabama to approve a vote to impose an additional 10.5 mils for Madison city schools on properties belonging to the citizens residing in that portion of the City of Madison located inside Limestone County.
If a majority of Madison citizens who reside inside Madison County vote for that referendum, and a majority of the citizens of Alabama vote for the referendum, then the vote to impose the additional 10.5 mils will take place. That vote will not include the people’s participation, but will be voted by the Madison City Council. Those responsible for this complicated amendment say that the citizens, who reside inside the City of Madison inside Limestone County, are not paying the 10.5 mils for Madison schools as are the citizens of Madison who reside inside Madison County.
The chances of this issue passing seem to be very good. The portion of the City of Madison inside Madison County has more than 20,000 registered voters, and the portion of the city inside Limestone County has 2,000 or less registered voters. This means that the Limestone County portion of the city of Madison is in the minority as far as voting is concerned, and probably will be for many more years. I really think a majority of those 20,000 voters inside Madison County will be glad to vote to impose an additional 10.5 mils on Limestone County residents, and not increase their own taxes.
The governing body of the city of Madison has found an innovative way to place the taxation decisions of Madison County residents upon the citizens of Limestone County in the name of equalization of ad valorem taxes. To ensure the success of the tax-raising measure, the amendment provides that the majority of voters in the State approves, and the majority of the voters of the City of Madison residing in Madison and Limestone Counties fail to approve (NO VOTE), then the amendment would allow the governing body of the City of Madison to call for subsequent elections every twelve months, hereafter, without legislative approval.
I’m not sure that the citizens of Madison who live in Limestone County know the effects of this referendum, but if they do they may be in agreement that they need to pay more taxes to support the City of Madison schools.
As a citizen of Athens, I won’t be paying this proposed increase, but I am concerned about the ramifications if it passes. To have Madison County voters impose taxes upon Limestone County citizens does not seem to be a good thing. I am sure whatever method either of these outside cities come up with to stick it to the citizens of Limestone County, the others will soon follow with the same thing. Each of them will also be claiming their fair share of the Limestone County taxes that we have voted upon ourselves and not upon them.
Opinion
Vote highlights problems with annexation
- Opinion
-
-
How flexible is school calendar law, really?
This was an ill-timed and ill-advised move by the Legislature but if cool heads prevail it will likely go the way of many state experiments and fade away.
- Post office plan shows path forward
-
L&S facility is no bargain for the county
We can’t help wondering how the county intends to pay to refurbish the center, including the standalone restaurant, which would take years and hundreds of thousands of dollars, before it could be occupied by county programs or rented to private businesses.
-
Can state afford to imprison for small offenses?
Alabama doesn’t have to give up its tough-on-crime stance completely. We just need to be smarter about the crimes we’re tough on.
- Orr: Pension reform legislation a step in the right direction
-
Longer school summer break would bring many benefits
Educators... say that children retain less from the previous year over a long break. That might be true, although much education research is suspect since it is often carried out with an agenda.
-
Growth at the University of Alabama comes with growing pains
It must find a way to slow the growth of tuition costs so that a University of Alabama education is still within reach of average Alabamians.
- Sen. Holtzclaw: Why I oppose a statewide school calendar
-
Charter schools legislation must be judged by its classroom results
Republicans are selling charter schools as a thinking-outside-the-box solution to the problems facing public education. They point to successful examples where charter schools are proven to get more out of public education dollars.
-
PACT needs action before lawmakers face pulling the plug
The Legislature closed PACT to new enrollees several years ago, but the state has an obligation to the people who’d already paid into the program.
- More Opinion Headlines
-
How flexible is school calendar law, really?


